Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10572/150
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSheeba, V-
dc.contributor.authorChandrashekaran, M K-
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Amitabh-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Vijay Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-06T11:04:47Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-06T11:04:47Z-
dc.date.issued2002-01-
dc.identifier0022-1910en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Insect Physiology 48(1), 25-32 (2002)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/150-
dc.description.abstractWe used four replicate outbred populations of Drosophila melanogaster to investigate whether the light regimes experienced during the pre-adult (larval and pupal) and early adult stages influence the free-running period (tau(DD)) of the circadian locomotor activity rhythm of adult flies. In a series of two experiments four different populations of flies were raised from egg to eclosion in constant light (LL), in light/dark (LD) 12:12 h cycle, and in constant darkness (DD). In the first experiment the adult male and female flies were directly transferred into DD and their locomotor activity was monitored, while in the second experiment the locomotor activity of the emerging adult flies was first assayed in LD 12:12 h for 15 days and then in DD for another 15 days. The tau(DD) of the locomotor activity rhythm of flies that were raised in all the three light regimes, LL, LD 12:12 h and in DD was significantly different from each other. The tau(DD) of the locomotor activity rhythm of the flies, which were raised in DD during their pre-adult stages, was significantly shorter than that of flies that were raised as pre-adults in LL regime, which in turn was significantly shorter than that of flies raised in LD 12:12 h regime. This pattern was consistent across both the experiments. The results of our experiments serve to emphasise the fact that in order to draw meaningful inferences about circadian rhythm parameters in insects, adequate attention should be paid to control and specify the environment in which pre-adult rearing takes place. The pattern of pre-adult and early adult light regime effects that we see differs from that previously observed in studies of mutant strains of D. melanogaster, and therefore, also points to the potential importance of inter-strain differences in the response of circadian organisation to external influences. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00139-1en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2002 Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.subjectcircadian rhythmsen_US
dc.subjectfree-running perioden_US
dc.subjectlight/dark cyclesen_US
dc.subjectlife stagesen_US
dc.subjectDrosophilaen_US
dc.subjectPost-Embryonic Developmenten_US
dc.subjectCircadian Pacemaker Developmenten_US
dc.subjectClock Geneen_US
dc.subjectGryllus-Bimaculatusen_US
dc.subjectFreerunning Perioden_US
dc.subjectNervous-Systemen_US
dc.subjectLighten_US
dc.subjectTimelessen_US
dc.subjectEntrainmenten_US
dc.subjectParametersen_US
dc.titleDevelopmental plasticity of the locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila melanogasteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles (V. K. Sharma)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2002 Journal of Insect Physiology 48 25–32.pdf
  Restricted Access
320 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.