Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10572/157
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Shailesh-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Dhanya-
dc.contributor.authorHarish, V S-
dc.contributor.authorDivya, S-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Vijay Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-10T06:39:07Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-10T06:39:07Z-
dc.date.issued2007-04-
dc.identifier0022-1910en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Insect Physiology 53(4), 332-342 (2007)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/157-
dc.descriptionRestricted Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we report the results of our study aimed at a systematic analysis of the circadian phenotypes of fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster selected for early and late adult emergence, in light of the "morning and evening oscillator" (M and E) model for circadian clocks. We monitored adult emergence and activity/rest rhythms in these flies under light/dark (LD) cycles with short (8:16 h), normal (12:12 h) and long (16:8 h) photoperiods, as well as under constant darkness (DD). Across all the three LD cycles, the early populations displayed a morning phenotype with peak of emergence and activity occurring earlier than the controls and greater anticipation to "lights-on" and weak anticipation to "lights-off", while the late populations showed an evening phenotype with peak of emergence and activity occurring later than the controls and greater anticipation to lights-off and weak anticipation to lights-on. The gate of adult emergence and duration of activity in the early populations was narrower than the controls, while those of the late populations were wider than the controls. In addition, the circadian periodicities of adult emergence and activity/rest rhythms of the early flies were significantly shorter than the controls, while those of the late flies were significantly longer than the controls. In summary, the circadian phenotypes indicate that the early populations have evolved a dominant M oscillator, while the late populations have evolved a dominant E oscillator, thus providing an empirical support for the M and E model in Drosophila. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.12.007en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2007 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectDrosophilaen_US
dc.subjecteclosionen_US
dc.subjectactivityen_US
dc.subjectselectionen_US
dc.subjectphotoperioden_US
dc.subjectmorning and evening oscillatorsen_US
dc.subjectRat Suprachiasmatic Nucleusen_US
dc.subjectLocomotor-Activity Rhythmen_US
dc.subjectCircadian-Rhythmen_US
dc.subjectFunctional-Analysisen_US
dc.subjectLife-Historyen_US
dc.subjectTime-Seriesen_US
dc.subjectDark Cyclesen_US
dc.subjectOptic Lobesen_US
dc.subjectClocken_US
dc.subjectMutantsen_US
dc.titlePossible evidence for morning and evening oscillators in Drosophila melanogaster populations selected for early and late adult emergenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles (V. K. Sharma)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2007 Journal of Insect Physiology 53 332–342.pdf
  Restricted Access
755.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.