Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10572/2327
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Vinod Kumar
dc.contributor.authorThakur, Ram Krishna
dc.contributor.authorEckloff, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorBaral, Aradhita
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ankita
dc.contributor.authorHalder, Rashi
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Akinchan
dc.contributor.authorAlam, Mohammad Parwez
dc.contributor.authorKundu, Tapas Kumar
dc.contributor.authorPandita, Raj
dc.contributor.authorPandita, Tej K.
dc.contributor.authorWieben, Eric D.
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Shantanu
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-17T05:09:15Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-17T05:09:15Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationYadav, VK; Thakur, RK; Eckloff, B; Baral, A; Singh, A; Halder, R; Kumar, A; Alam, MP; Kundu, TK; Pandita, R; Pandita, TK; Wieben, ED; Chowdhury, S, Promoter-proximal transcription factor binding is transcriptionally active when coupled with nucleosome repositioning in immediate vicinity. Nucleic Acids Research 2014, 42 (15) 9602-9611, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku596en_US
dc.identifier.citationNucleic Acids Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citation42en_US
dc.identifier.citation15en_US
dc.identifier.issn0305-1048
dc.identifier.urihttps://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/2327-
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have analyzed patterns of transcription, transcription factor (TF) binding or mapped nucleosome occupancy across the genome. These suggest that the three aspects are genetically connected but the cause and effect relationships are still unknown. For example, physiologic TF binding studies involve many TFs, consequently, it is difficult to assign nucleosome reorganization to the binding site occupancy of any particular TF. Therefore, several aspects remain unclear: does TF binding influence nucleosome (re) organizations locally or impact the chromatin landscape at a more global level; are all or only a fraction of TF binding a result of reorganization in nucleosome occupancy and do all TF binding and associated changes in nucleosome occupancy result in altered gene expression? With these in mind, following characterization of two states (before and after induction of a single TF of choice) we determined: (i) genomic binding sites of the TF, (ii) promoter nucleosome occupancy and (iii) transcriptome profiles. Results demonstrated that promoter-proximal TF binding influenced expression of the target gene when it was coupled to nucleosome repositioning at or close to its binding site in most cases. In contrast, only in few cases change in target gene expression was found when TF binding occurred without local nucleosome reorganization.en_US
dc.description.uri1362-4962en_US
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku596en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rights@Oxford University Press, 2014en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry & Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectNm23/Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinaseen_US
dc.subjectSaccharomyces-Cerevisiaeen_US
dc.subjectHistone Modificationsen_US
dc.subjectCancer Metastasisen_US
dc.subjectGene-Expressionen_US
dc.subjectCell Invasionen_US
dc.subjectHuman Genomeen_US
dc.subjectDNA-Bindingen_US
dc.subjectChromatinen_US
dc.subjectMechanismsen_US
dc.titlePromoter-proximal transcription factor binding is transcriptionally active when coupled with nucleosome repositioning in immediate vicinityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Papers (Tapas K. Kundu)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
205-OA.pdf3.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.