Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10572/2451
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSarangi, Manaswini
dc.contributor.authorGanguly, Payel
dc.contributor.authorZenia
dc.contributor.authorArvind, Chiti
dc.contributor.authorLakshman, Abhilash
dc.contributor.authorVidya, T. N. C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-21T07:06:30Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-21T07:06:30Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationSarangi, M; Ganguly, P; Zenia; Arvind, C; Lakshman, A; Vidya, TNC, Common Myna Roosts Are Not Recruitment Centres. PLoS One 2014, 9 (8), e103406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103406en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS Oneen_US
dc.identifier.citation9en_US
dc.identifier.citation8en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/2451-
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractWe studied communal roosting in the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) in the light of the recruitment centre hypothesis and predation at the roost. The number and sizes of flocks departing from and arriving at focal roosts were recorded over a two year period. We also recorded the sizes and behaviour of foraging flocks. We found that flock sizes of birds departing from roosts at sunrise were larger than those at the feeding site, suggesting that there was no recruitment from the roosts. Flocks entering the roosts during sunset were larger on average than those leaving the following sunrise, suggesting no consolidation of flocks in the morning. Flocks entering the roosts at sunset were also larger on average than those that had left that sunrise, although there was no recruitment at the feeding site. There was no effect of group size on the proportion of time spent feeding. Contrary to expectation, single birds showed lower apparent vigilance than birds that foraged in pairs or groups, possibly due to scrounging tactics being used in the presence of feeding companions. Thus, the recruitment centre hypothesis did not hold in our study population of mynas. Predation at dawn and dusk were also not important to communal roosting: predators near the roosts did not result in larger flocks, and resulted in larger durations of arrival/departure contrary to expectation. Since flock sizes were smallest at the feeding site and larger in the evening than in the morning, but did not coincide with predator activity, information transfer unrelated to food (such as breeding opportunities) may possibly give rise to the evening aggregations.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103406en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights@Public Library of Science, 2014en_US
dc.subjectInformation-Center Hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectCorvus-Corone-Cornixen_US
dc.subjectCommunal Roostsen_US
dc.subjectGroup-Sizeen_US
dc.subjectAcridotheres-Tristisen_US
dc.subjectBirdsen_US
dc.subjectFooden_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.subjectCrowsen_US
dc.subjectStrategiesen_US
dc.titleCommon Myna Roosts Are Not Recruitment Centresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles (Vidya, T.N.C.)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
43-OA.pdf576.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.