Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10572/2793
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVasu, Sheeba-
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, Rutvij-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-06T05:12:08Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-06T05:12:08Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationKulkarni, Rutvij. 2019, Preliminary characterisation of aggregation behaviour in drosophila melanogaster, MS thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluruen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10572/2793-
dc.description.abstractWhen a cat detects prey, it stalks the prey before attacking it. Prey detection, thus, causes the cat to perform a series of non-random actions to conceal itself and capture the prey. These non-random actions are repeated every time the cat encounters any sort of prey. However, these actions may not be seen when the cat detects other non-food objects or if the prey is unfamiliar to the cat. Sometimes, the cat may fail to show these actions even when it encounters familiar prey simply because it may have fed recently. Such non-random actions are called behaviours and, as the above observations illustrate, they occur in response to specific environmental stimuli in a context dependent manner. This context specificity often depends on whether the organism stands to receive a net benefit by performing the behaviour. Thus, behaviours serve as responses to changes in an organism's environment that may allow the organism to adapt to these changes. Given the importance of responding to constantly changing environments, behaviours are ubiquitous across taxa. This ubiquity is accompanied by great diversity in form and function of behaviours. Consequently, a variety of questions may be posed to understand how and why such behavioural diversity exists in nature. Tinbergen (1963) broadly organized these questions into four complementary categories - causation, ontogeny, function and phylogeny (or evolution) - and thereby provided a framework to address different aspects of any given behaviour. These questions may be further grouped into proximate (or how?) questions (causation and ontogeny), which explore the biological mechanisms underlying behaviours, and ultimate (or why?) questions (function and phylogeny) which probe the evolutionary processes that underlie behaviours. Between them, these questions provide a comprehensive approach to studying any behaviour. Hence, I have used this framework to organize and discuss the literature available for aggregation behaviour in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Researchen_US
dc.rights© 2019 JNCASR-
dc.subjectAggregation behaviouren_US
dc.subjectDrosophila melanogasteren_US
dc.titlePreliminary characterisation of aggregation behaviour in drosophila melanogasteren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasteren_US
dc.type.qualificationnameMSen_US
dc.publisher.departmentEvolutionary and Integrative Biology Unit (EIBU)en_US
Appears in Collections:Student Theses (EIBU)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
9605.pdf10.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.