Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10572/72
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sheeba, Vasu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kaneko, Maki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sharma, Vijay Kumar | - |
dc.contributor.author | Holmes, Todd C | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-21T11:51:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-03-21T11:51:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier | 1040-9238 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Critical Reviews In Biochemistry And Molecular Biology 43(1), 37-61 (2008) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/72 | - |
dc.description | NIH-PA Author Manuscript. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Molecular genetic analysis of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has revolutionized our understanding of the transcription/translation loop mechanisms underlying the circadian molecular oscillator. More recently, Drosophila has been used to understand how different neuronal groups within the circadian pacemaker circuit interact to regulate the overall behavior of the fly in response to daily cyclic environmental cues as well as seasonal changes.,Our present understanding of circadian timekeeping at the molecular and circuit level is discussed with a critical evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of present models. Two models for circadian neural circuits are compared: one that posits that two anatomically distinct oscillators control the synchronization to the two major daily morning and evening transitions, versus a distributed network model that posits that many cell-autonomous oscillators are coordinated in a complex fashion and respond via plastic mechanisms to changes in environmental cues. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409230701829128 | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18307108 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2008 Taylor & Francis Inc | en_US |
dc.subject | Oscillator | en_US |
dc.subject | Entrainment | en_US |
dc.subject | Photoperiod | en_US |
dc.subject | Morning-evening oscillator model | en_US |
dc.subject | Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Neurons | en_US |
dc.subject | Transcriptional Repressor Activity | en_US |
dc.subject | Hormone- Immunoreactive Neurons | en_US |
dc.subject | Locomotor-Activity Rhythm | en_US |
dc.subject | Clock Proteins Period | en_US |
dc.subject | First Optic Neuropil | en_US |
dc.subject | Musca-Domestica L | en_US |
dc.subject | Nervous-System | en_US |
dc.subject | Behavioral Rhythms | en_US |
dc.subject | Posttranslational Regulation | en_US |
dc.title | The Drosophila Circadian Pacemaker Circuit: Pas de Deux or Tarantella? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Research Articles (V. K. Sharma) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
drosophila-circadian-pacemaker-circuit.pdf | 1.93 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.