DSpace Repository

Developmental plasticity of the locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila melanogaster

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sheeba, V
dc.contributor.author Chandrashekaran, M K
dc.contributor.author Joshi, Amitabh
dc.contributor.author Sharma, Vijay Kumar
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-06T11:04:47Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-06T11:04:47Z
dc.date.issued 2002-01
dc.identifier 0022-1910 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Insect Physiology 48(1), 25-32 (2002) en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/150
dc.description.abstract We used four replicate outbred populations of Drosophila melanogaster to investigate whether the light regimes experienced during the pre-adult (larval and pupal) and early adult stages influence the free-running period (tau(DD)) of the circadian locomotor activity rhythm of adult flies. In a series of two experiments four different populations of flies were raised from egg to eclosion in constant light (LL), in light/dark (LD) 12:12 h cycle, and in constant darkness (DD). In the first experiment the adult male and female flies were directly transferred into DD and their locomotor activity was monitored, while in the second experiment the locomotor activity of the emerging adult flies was first assayed in LD 12:12 h for 15 days and then in DD for another 15 days. The tau(DD) of the locomotor activity rhythm of flies that were raised in all the three light regimes, LL, LD 12:12 h and in DD was significantly different from each other. The tau(DD) of the locomotor activity rhythm of the flies, which were raised in DD during their pre-adult stages, was significantly shorter than that of flies that were raised as pre-adults in LL regime, which in turn was significantly shorter than that of flies raised in LD 12:12 h regime. This pattern was consistent across both the experiments. The results of our experiments serve to emphasise the fact that in order to draw meaningful inferences about circadian rhythm parameters in insects, adequate attention should be paid to control and specify the environment in which pre-adult rearing takes place. The pattern of pre-adult and early adult light regime effects that we see differs from that previously observed in studies of mutant strains of D. melanogaster, and therefore, also points to the potential importance of inter-strain differences in the response of circadian organisation to external influences. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.description.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00139-1 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pergamon Elsevier Science Ltd en_US
dc.rights © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd en_US
dc.subject circadian rhythms en_US
dc.subject free-running period en_US
dc.subject light/dark cycles en_US
dc.subject life stages en_US
dc.subject Drosophila en_US
dc.subject Post-Embryonic Development en_US
dc.subject Circadian Pacemaker Development en_US
dc.subject Clock Gene en_US
dc.subject Gryllus-Bimaculatus en_US
dc.subject Freerunning Period en_US
dc.subject Nervous-System en_US
dc.subject Light en_US
dc.subject Timeless en_US
dc.subject Entrainment en_US
dc.subject Parameters en_US
dc.title Developmental plasticity of the locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila melanogaster en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account