dc.contributor.author |
Kumar, Shailesh
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kumar, Dhanya
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Harish, V S
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Divya, S
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sharma, Vijay Kumar
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-01-10T06:39:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-01-10T06:39:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2007-04 |
|
dc.identifier |
0022-1910 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Journal Of Insect Physiology 53(4), 332-342 (2007) |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/157 |
|
dc.description |
Restricted Access |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
In this paper, we report the results of our study aimed at a systematic analysis of the circadian phenotypes of fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster selected for early and late adult emergence, in light of the "morning and evening oscillator" (M and E) model for circadian clocks. We monitored adult emergence and activity/rest rhythms in these flies under light/dark (LD) cycles with short (8:16 h), normal (12:12 h) and long (16:8 h) photoperiods, as well as under constant darkness (DD). Across all the three LD cycles, the early populations displayed a morning phenotype with peak of emergence and activity occurring earlier than the controls and greater anticipation to "lights-on" and weak anticipation to "lights-off", while the late populations showed an evening phenotype with peak of emergence and activity occurring later than the controls and greater anticipation to lights-off and weak anticipation to lights-on. The gate of adult emergence and duration of activity in the early populations was narrower than the controls, while those of the late populations were wider than the controls. In addition, the circadian periodicities of adult emergence and activity/rest rhythms of the early flies were significantly shorter than the controls, while those of the late flies were significantly longer than the controls. In summary, the circadian phenotypes indicate that the early populations have evolved a dominant M oscillator, while the late populations have evolved a dominant E oscillator, thus providing an empirical support for the M and E model in Drosophila. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.12.007 |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2007 Elsevier Ltd |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Drosophila |
en_US |
dc.subject |
eclosion |
en_US |
dc.subject |
activity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
selection |
en_US |
dc.subject |
photoperiod |
en_US |
dc.subject |
morning and evening oscillators |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Locomotor-Activity Rhythm |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Circadian-Rhythm |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Functional-Analysis |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Life-History |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Time-Series |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Dark Cycles |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Optic Lobes |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Clock |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Mutants |
en_US |
dc.title |
Possible evidence for morning and evening oscillators in Drosophila melanogaster populations selected for early and late adult emergence |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |