DSpace Repository

Possible evidence for morning and evening oscillators in Drosophila melanogaster populations selected for early and late adult emergence

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumar, Shailesh
dc.contributor.author Kumar, Dhanya
dc.contributor.author Harish, V S
dc.contributor.author Divya, S
dc.contributor.author Sharma, Vijay Kumar
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-10T06:39:07Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-10T06:39:07Z
dc.date.issued 2007-04
dc.identifier 0022-1910 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Journal Of Insect Physiology 53(4), 332-342 (2007) en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/157
dc.description Restricted Access en_US
dc.description.abstract In this paper, we report the results of our study aimed at a systematic analysis of the circadian phenotypes of fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster selected for early and late adult emergence, in light of the "morning and evening oscillator" (M and E) model for circadian clocks. We monitored adult emergence and activity/rest rhythms in these flies under light/dark (LD) cycles with short (8:16 h), normal (12:12 h) and long (16:8 h) photoperiods, as well as under constant darkness (DD). Across all the three LD cycles, the early populations displayed a morning phenotype with peak of emergence and activity occurring earlier than the controls and greater anticipation to "lights-on" and weak anticipation to "lights-off", while the late populations showed an evening phenotype with peak of emergence and activity occurring later than the controls and greater anticipation to lights-off and weak anticipation to lights-on. The gate of adult emergence and duration of activity in the early populations was narrower than the controls, while those of the late populations were wider than the controls. In addition, the circadian periodicities of adult emergence and activity/rest rhythms of the early flies were significantly shorter than the controls, while those of the late flies were significantly longer than the controls. In summary, the circadian phenotypes indicate that the early populations have evolved a dominant M oscillator, while the late populations have evolved a dominant E oscillator, thus providing an empirical support for the M and E model in Drosophila. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.description.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.12.007 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd en_US
dc.rights © 2007 Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.subject Drosophila en_US
dc.subject eclosion en_US
dc.subject activity en_US
dc.subject selection en_US
dc.subject photoperiod en_US
dc.subject morning and evening oscillators en_US
dc.subject Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus en_US
dc.subject Locomotor-Activity Rhythm en_US
dc.subject Circadian-Rhythm en_US
dc.subject Functional-Analysis en_US
dc.subject Life-History en_US
dc.subject Time-Series en_US
dc.subject Dark Cycles en_US
dc.subject Optic Lobes en_US
dc.subject Clock en_US
dc.subject Mutants en_US
dc.title Possible evidence for morning and evening oscillators in Drosophila melanogaster populations selected for early and late adult emergence en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account