DSpace Repository

PER/TIM-mediated amplification, gene dosage effects and temperature compensation in an interlocking-feedback loop model of the Drosophila circadian clock

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ruoff, Peter
dc.contributor.author Christensen, Melinda K
dc.contributor.author Sharma, Vijay Kumar
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-16T09:55:05Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-16T09:55:05Z
dc.date.issued 2005-11-07
dc.identifier 0022-5193 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Journal Of Theoretical Biology 237(1), 41-57 (2005) en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/186
dc.description Restricted Access en_US
dc.description.abstract We have analysed a first-order kinetic representation of a interlocking-feedback loop model for the Drosophila circadian clock. In this model, the transcription factor Drosophila CLOCK (dCLK) which activates the clock genes period (per) and timeless (tim) is subjected to positive and negative regulations by the proteins 'PAR Domain Protein 1' (PDP1) and VRILLE (VRI), whose transcription is activated by dCLK. The PER/TIM complex binds to dCLK and in this way reduces the activity of dCLK. The results of our simulations suggest that the positive and negative feedback loops of Pdp1 and vri are essential for the overall oscillations. Although self sustained oscillations can be obtained without per/tim, the model shows that the PER/TIM complex plays an important role in amplification and stabilization of the oscillations generated by the Pdp1/vri positive/negative feedback loops. We further show that in contrast to a single (per/tim) negative feedback loop oscillator, the interlocking-feedback loop model can readily account for the effect of gene dosages of per, vri, and Pdp1 on the period length. Calculations of phase resetting on a temperature compensated version of the model shows good agreement with experimental phase response curves for high and low temperature pulses. Also, the partial losses of temperature compensation in per(S) and per(L) mutants can be described, which are related to decreased stabilities of the PER/TIM complex in per(S) and the stronger/more stable inhibitory complex between dCLK and PER/TIM in per(L), respectively. The model shows (somewhat surprisingly) poor entrainment properties, especially under extended light/dark (L/D) cycles, which suggests that parts of the L/D tracking or sensing system are not well represented. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.description.uri http://dx.doi.org//10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.03.030 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Academic Press Ltd Elsevier Science Ltd en_US
dc.rights © 2005 Elsevier Ltd en_US
dc.subject circadian oscillations en_US
dc.subject Drosophila en_US
dc.subject temperature compensation en_US
dc.subject gene dosage en_US
dc.subject interlocking-feedback loop en_US
dc.subject molecular amplification en_US
dc.subject PDP1 en_US
dc.subject VRILLE en_US
dc.subject PERIOD en_US
dc.subject TIMELESS en_US
dc.subject Crassulacean Acid Metabolism en_US
dc.subject Per-Tim Complex en_US
dc.subject Goodwin Model en_US
dc.subject Sporulation Rhythm en_US
dc.subject Locomotor-Activity en_US
dc.subject Neurospora-Crassa en_US
dc.subject Molecular-Bases en_US
dc.subject Light-Pulses en_US
dc.subject Oscillator en_US
dc.subject Protein en_US
dc.title PER/TIM-mediated amplification, gene dosage effects and temperature compensation in an interlocking-feedback loop model of the Drosophila circadian clock en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account