DSpace Repository

Common Myna Roosts Are Not Recruitment Centres

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sarangi, Manaswini
dc.contributor.author Ganguly, Payel
dc.contributor.author Zenia
dc.contributor.author Arvind, Chiti
dc.contributor.author Lakshman, Abhilash
dc.contributor.author Vidya, T. N. C.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-21T07:06:30Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-21T07:06:30Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation Sarangi, M; Ganguly, P; Zenia; Arvind, C; Lakshman, A; Vidya, TNC, Common Myna Roosts Are Not Recruitment Centres. PLoS One 2014, 9 (8), e103406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103406 en_US
dc.identifier.citation PLoS One en_US
dc.identifier.citation 9 en_US
dc.identifier.citation 8 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri https://libjncir.jncasr.ac.in/xmlui/10572/2451
dc.description Open Access en_US
dc.description.abstract We studied communal roosting in the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) in the light of the recruitment centre hypothesis and predation at the roost. The number and sizes of flocks departing from and arriving at focal roosts were recorded over a two year period. We also recorded the sizes and behaviour of foraging flocks. We found that flock sizes of birds departing from roosts at sunrise were larger than those at the feeding site, suggesting that there was no recruitment from the roosts. Flocks entering the roosts during sunset were larger on average than those leaving the following sunrise, suggesting no consolidation of flocks in the morning. Flocks entering the roosts at sunset were also larger on average than those that had left that sunrise, although there was no recruitment at the feeding site. There was no effect of group size on the proportion of time spent feeding. Contrary to expectation, single birds showed lower apparent vigilance than birds that foraged in pairs or groups, possibly due to scrounging tactics being used in the presence of feeding companions. Thus, the recruitment centre hypothesis did not hold in our study population of mynas. Predation at dawn and dusk were also not important to communal roosting: predators near the roosts did not result in larger flocks, and resulted in larger durations of arrival/departure contrary to expectation. Since flock sizes were smallest at the feeding site and larger in the evening than in the morning, but did not coincide with predator activity, information transfer unrelated to food (such as breeding opportunities) may possibly give rise to the evening aggregations. en_US
dc.description.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103406 en_US
dc.language.iso English en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.rights @Public Library of Science, 2014 en_US
dc.subject Information-Center Hypothesis en_US
dc.subject Corvus-Corone-Cornix en_US
dc.subject Communal Roosts en_US
dc.subject Group-Size en_US
dc.subject Acridotheres-Tristis en_US
dc.subject Birds en_US
dc.subject Food en_US
dc.subject Behavior en_US
dc.subject Crows en_US
dc.subject Strategies en_US
dc.title Common Myna Roosts Are Not Recruitment Centres en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account